[Rzeka miejska u Dickensa, Dostojewskiego i Prusa]
Abstrakt
The article offers a comparative analysis of the literary presentations of three rivers (the Thames in London, the Neva in Petersburg, and the Wisła in Warsaw) in the following novels: Charles Dickens’s Our Mutual Friend, Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment, and Bolesław Prus’s The Doll. The author discusses the presentations of these rivers and the ways the writers engaged river imagery with the cities. The rivers played crucial roles in shaping the plot and in the characterisation of the protagonists. The Thames serves a crucial part in Our Mutual Friend: it offers safety to some characters, but it is also a deadly power to others. The Neva and the Wisła are related to self-exploration of the main characters who find it necessary to wander around the river banks; it is near the river bank when they undergo an internal transformation (Raskolnikov) or reflect upon humanity (Wokulski).
Słowa kluczowe
miasto; śmierć; brud; geografia; rzeka; społeczeństwo
Bibliografia
Ackroyd, Peter. Thames. Sacred River. London: Vintage Books, 2008.
Aeschliman, M. D. “Dickens At 200”. National Review 64, no. 19 (2012): 62-63.
Allen, Rick. “John Fisher Murray, Dickens, and the ‘Attraction of Repulsion’”. Dickens Quarterly 16:3 (1999): 139-59.
Antsiferov, N. P. Peterburg Dostoevskogo. Petrograd: Brokgauz-Efron, 1923.
Backouche, Isabel. “From Parisian River to National Waterway. The Social Functions of the Seine, 1750−1850”. In Rivers in History: Perspectives on Waterways in Europe and North America, ed. Christof Mauch, Thomas Zelle. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, 2008, 26-40.
Barańczak, Stanisław. “Introduction”. In Bolesław Prus, The Doll, trans. David Walsh. Budapest: Central European University Press, 1966, VII-XV.
Baumgarten, Murray. “Fictions of the city”. In The Cambridge Companion to Charles Dickens, ed. John O. Jordan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, 106-119.
Budrewicz, Aleksandra. Dickens w Polsce. Pierwsze stulecie. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Pedagogicznego, 2015, 186-190.
Budrewicz, Aleksandra. “Near the Riverbank: women, danger and place in Dickens”. In Crossroads in literature and culture, ed. Jacek Fabiszak, Ewa Urbaniak-Rybicka, Bartosz Wolski. Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer, 2013, 59-72.
Cheadle, Brian. “The late novels: ‘Great Expectations’ and ‘Our Mutual Friend’”. In The Cambridge Companion to Charles Dickens, ed. John O. Jordan,Cambridge University Press, 2001, 78-91.
Clerc, Florence. “Grotesque Extravagance in the Fictional Worlds of Charles Dickens and Nicolai Gogol from the perspectives of ‘Fantastic Realism’ and the European grotesque tradition”. In The Grotesque in the Fiction of Charles Dickens and Other 19th-century European Novelists, ed. Isabelle Hervouet-Farrar, Max Vega-Ritter. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2014.
Cowley, Jason. “The underground men”. New Statesman 133, no. 4670 (2004): 50-51.
Dickens, Charles. Our Mutual Friend, intr. Deborah Wynne. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Classics, 2002.
Dostoevsky, Fyodor. Crime and Punishment, trans. JessieCoulson. Oxford: Oxford World Classics, 1998.
Dostoevsky, Fyodor. Letters of Fyodor Michailovitch Dostoevsky to his Family and Friends, trans. Ethel Golburn Mayne. London, 1914.
Dostoevsky, Fyodor. “Statyi za 1845−1868 gody”. In Tomashevsky B., Khalabayev K., ed. Polnoye sobranie khudozhestvennykh sochinenii, vol. XIII, Moscow − Leningrad, 1930.
Fanger, Donald. Dostoevsky and Romantic Realism. A Study of Dostoevsky in relation to Balzac, Dickens and Gogol. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967.
Futrell, Michael H. “Gogol and Dickens”, The Slavonic and East European Review 34, no. 83 (1956): 443-459.
Gissing, George. Charles Dickens: A Critical Study. London: Blackie and Son, 1898.
Godsil, Geraldine. “Reflections on death and mourning in relation to Dickens’s novel ‘Our Mutual Friend’”. Journal of Analytical Psychology 50 (2005): 469-481.
Goetsh, Paul. “The Thames River Valley and London. An Ecological Theme”. In Modernisierung und Literatur. Festchrift für Hans Ulrich Seeber, ed. Walter Goberl, et Stephan Kohl, Hubert Zapf. Tübingen: Narr 2000, 127-138.
Hanson, Gillian Mary. Riverbank and Seashore in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century British literature. Jefferson: McFarland & Company, 2006.
Herendeen, Wyman F. From Landscape to Literature. The River and the Myth of Geography. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1986. http://www.litmuseum.ru/dostomsk.en.htm accessed 17th of January 2012.
Jochemczyk, Mariusz, et Miłosz Piotrowiak, ed. Urzeczenie. Locje literatury i wyobraźni. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, 2013.
Kłosek-Kozłowska, Danuta. “Rola rzeki w rozwoju miasta”. In Miasto po obu stronach rzeki. Różne oblicza kultury, ed. Andrzej Stawarz.Warszawa: Polskie Towarzystwo Etnologii Miasta, 2007, 11-24.
Kolbuszewski, Jacek, ed. Rzeki: antologia poetycka.Wrocław: Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Polonistyki Wrocławskiej, 1998.
Kulczycka-Saloni, Janina. “Z dziejów Dickensa w Polsce: ‘Emancypantki’ a ‘Bleak House’”. Prace Polonistyczne V (1947), 145-182.
Lary, N. M. Dostoevsky and Dickens. A Study of Literary Influence. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1973.
Lary, N. M. “Dostoevsky’s Dickens (Book)”. Victorian Studies 2 (1983), 26.
Law, Jude. The Social Life of Fluids. Blood, Milk, and the Water in the Victorian Novel. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press, 2012.
Langbauer, Laurie. “Ethics and Theory: Suffering Children in Dickens, Dostoevsky, and Le Guin”. ELH. Spring 75, no. 1 (2008): 89-108.
Lindenmeyr, Adele. “Raskolnikov’s City and the Napoleonic Plan”. In F. Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment. A Casebook, ed. Richard Arthur Peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, 37-50.
Litvack, Leon. “Images of the River in ‘Our Mutual Friend’”. Dickens Quarterly 20:1 (2003): 35-55.
Litvack, Leon. “Our Mutual Friend”. In A Companion to Charles Dickens, ed. David Paroissien. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2008, 433-443.
MacPike, Loralee. Dostoevsky’s Dickens: a study of literary influence. London: Prior, 1981.
Miller, Joseph Hillis. Topographies. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995.
Osiński, Dawid Maria. „Czy język ulicy da się wysłowić i zapisać? Londyńczycy, wilniucy, warszawiacy, paryżanie i dublinerzy − pisarze dziewiętnastowieczni wobec problemów reprezentacji (na przykładzie szkiców i obrazków)”. In Ulica, zaułek, bruk. Z problematyki miasta w literaturze drugiej połowy XIX i początku XX wieku, ed. Katarzyna Badowska, Agnieszka Janiak-Staszek. Łódź:Wydział Filologiczny Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 2013, 213-250.
Prus, Bolesław. The Doll, trans. David Walsh. Budapest: Central European University Press, 1966.
Schlicke, Paul. “Our Mutual Friend”. In Oxford Reader’s Companion to Dickens, ed. P. Schlicke. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, 442-446.
Skrunda, Wiktor. Z dziejów opisowości literackiej. Rosyjski szkic fizjologiczny lat czterdziestych XIX wieku. Warszawa: PWN, 1988.
Sloan, John. “The Literary Affinity of Gissing and Dostoevsky: Revising Dickens”. English Literature in Transition, 1880−1920 32, no. 4 (1989): 440-453.
Strachan, Edward, et Roy Bolton. Russia and Europe in the 19th Century. London: Sphinx Fine Art, 2008.
Tambling, Jeremy. Going Astray. Dickens and London. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited, 2009.
Williams,Victoria. “Dickens’s Use of the Fairy Tale in ‘Our Mutual Friend’”. Pennsylvania Literary Journal 2, no. 2 (2010): 47-75.
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny w Krakowie Polska
Wszystkie artykuły prezentowane na łamach „Prace Filologiczne. Literaturoznawstwo” są publikowane w otwartym dostępie na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa wersja 3.0 (CC-BY) 
