Jan Andrzej Morsztyn i Votum z Seneki; albo Skorpion i jego użądlenia
Abstrakt
The present paper investigates the relevance of structural and intertextual information for an interpretation of Votum z Seneki dla Jegomości Pana Chorążego Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego by Jan Andrzej Morsztyn. Placing both the structural and intertextual properties of the text against a wider context of the literary practices of the period, of the contemporaneous philosophical discussions and tendencies, as well as philological discussions of relevant hypotexts, allows one, it is argued, to uncover at least two distinct, although closely intertwined, layers of irony and scepticism in Morsztyn’s piece.
Słowa kluczowe
Jan Andrzej Morsztyn; Seneka; Horacy; epigram; stoicyzm
Bibliografia
Abel, Günter. Stoizismus und Frühe Neuzeit. Zur Entstehungsgeschichte modernen Denkens im Felde von Ethik und Politik. Berlin − New York: de Gruyter, 1977.
Billerbeck, Margarethe and Mario Somazzi. Repertorium der Konjekturen in den Seneca-Trago¨dien. Leiden − Boston: Brill, 2009.
Billerbeck, Margarethe, ed. Seneca: Hercules Furens. Leiden − Boston: Brill, 1999.
Blom, Hans and Laurens Winkel. Introduction in Grotius and the Stoa, ed. Hans Blom and Laurens Winkel, 1-20. Assen: van Gorcum, 2004.
Brooke, Christopher. Philosophic Pride: Stoicism and Political Thought from Lipsius to Rousseau. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.
Brundell, Barry. Pierre Gassendi: From Aristotelianism to a New Natural Philosophy. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987.
Burke, Peter. “Translations into Latin in early modern Europe”. In Cultural Translation in Early Modern Europe, ed. Peter Burke and R. Po-chia Hsia, 65-80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Burke, Peter. Languages and Communities in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Chamard, Henri, ed. Joachim du Bellay, La Deffence et Illustration de la Langue Francoyse, édition critique publiée par Henri Chamard. Paris: Nizet, 1970.
Charles, Adam, et Paul Tannery, ed. Oeuvres de Descartes. Paris: J. Vrin/ C.N.R.S., 1964−1976.
Colish, Marcia. The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages. Leiden − Boston: Brill, 1985.
Craze, Michael. The Life and Lyrics of Andrew Marvell. New York: Barnes and Noble, 1979.
Daalder, Joost. “Seneca and the Text of Marvell’s ‘Climb at court for me that will’”, Parergon 7 (1989): 107-110.
Delrio, Martin. Syntagma tragoediae latinae. Paris: Pierre Billaine, 1620.
Diggle, James, ed. Euripides: Fabulae, vol. III. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
Donnelly, John. “Planning Jesuit Education from Loyola to the 1599 Ratio Studiorum”. In History Has Many Voices, ed. Lee PalmerWandel et RobertM. Kingdon. Kirksville, Mo.: Truman State University Press, 2003, 57-69.
Ettinghausen, Henry. Francisco de Quevedo and the Neostoic Movement. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1972.
Fischer, Susanna E. “Systematic Connections between Seneca’s Philosophical Works and Tragedies”. In Brill’s Companion to Seneca Philosopher and Dramatist, ed. Gregor Damschen et Andreas Heil. Leiden − Boston: Brill, 2014, 745-768.
Fitch, John G., ed. Seneca’s Hercules Furens. A critical text with introduction and commentary. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1987.
Fitzon, Thorsten. “Von müßigen Gescha¨ften und freiheitlichem Stand. Stoische Tradition in der Landlebendichtung des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts”. In Stoizismus in der europaischen Philosophie, Literatur, Kunst und Politik, ed. Barbara Neymeyr, Jochen Schmidt et Bernhard Zimmermann. Berlin − New York: de Gruyter, 2008, 833-851.
Fothergill-Payne, Louise. “Seneca’s role in popularizing Epicurus in the sixteenth century”. In Atoms, Pneuma, and Tranquillity. Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought, ed.Margaret J. Osler. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991, 115-134.
Fraenkel, Eduard. Horace. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1957.
Franke, Ludwig Carl. Fasti Horatiani. Accedit epistola C. Lachmanni. Berlin: Wilhelm Besser, 1839.
Green, Ian. Humanism and Protestantism in Early Modern English Education. Farnham: Ashgate, 2009.
Greene, Thomas. The Light in Troy: Imitation and Discovery in Renaissance Poetry. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982.
Grendler, Paul. Schooling in Renaissance Italy: Literacy and Learning, 1300−1600. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.
Gross, Karl. “Numquam minus otiosus, quam cum otiosus. Das Weiterleben eines antiken Sprichwortes im Abendland”. Antike und Abendland 26 (1980): 122-137.
Günther, Hans-Christian, ed. Euripides, Iphigenia Aulidensis. Leipzig: Teubner, 1988.
Günther, Hans-Christian. “The Book of Iambi”. In Brill’s Companion to Horace, ed. Hans-Christian Günther. Leiden − Boston: Brill, 2013, 169-210.
Harrison, Stephen J. Generic Enrichment in Vergil and Horace. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Harrison, Stephen J. “Some Generic Problems in Horace’s Epodes: or, On (Not) Being Archilochus”. In Iambic Ideas: Essays on a Poetic Tradition from Archaic Greece to the Late Roman Empire, ed. A. Cávarzere, A. Barchiesi. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001, 165-186.
Heinsius, Daniel. De constitutione tragoediae. Constitution de la tragédie, dite, La poétique d’Heinsius, ed. trans. et notes Anne Duprat. Genève: Librarie Droz, 2001.
Hine, Harry. “Interpretatio Stoica of Senecan Tragedy”. In Sénèque le tragique, ed.Wolf-Lüder Liebermann, Margarethe Billerbeck, Ernst A. Schmidt. Genève: Fondation Hardt, 2004, 173-209.
Jensen, Kristian. “The humanist Reform of Latin and Latin Teaching”. In The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Humanism, ed. Jill Kraye. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, 63-81.
Johnson, Timothy S. Horace’s Iambic Criticism. Leiden − Boston: Brill, 2012.
Joy, Lynn Sumida. Gassendi the Atomist: Advocate of History in an Age of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
Kennedy, George. Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1999.
Kraye, Jill. “Conceptions of moral philosophy”. In The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-century Philosophy, ed. Daniel Garber et Michael Ayers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, vol. 2, 1279-1316.
Kraye, Jill. “Moral philosophy”. In The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, ed. Charles Schmitt et Quentin Skinner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, 303-386.
Kukulski, Leszek, ed. Jan Andrzej Morsztyn, Utwory zebrane. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, 1971.
Lambin, Denys, ed. Q. Horatius Flaccus: Opera. Lyon: Jean de Tournes, 1561.
Lasocińska, Estera. “Cnota sama z mądrością jest naszym żywotem”. Stoickie pojęcie cnoty w poezji polskiej XVII wieku. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Literackich PAN, 2003.
Lefèvre, Eckard. “Die philosophische Bedeutung der Seneca-Trago¨die am Beispiel des ‘Thyestes’”. In Aufstieg und Niedergang der ro¨mischen Welt: Geschichte und Kultur Roms im Spiegel der neueren Forschung, ed. Hildegard Temporini. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1985, vol. 2,32,2, 1263-1283.
Lipsius, Justus, ed. C. Cornelii Taciti Opera quae exstant. Antwerp: Jan Moretus, 1607.
Lipsius, Justus. De constantia libri duo, qui alloquium praecipue continent in publicis malis. Nürnberg: Dietrich Gerlach, 1594.
Lohmeier, Anke-Marie. Beatus ille. Studien zum Lob des Landlebens in der Literatur des absolutistischen Zeitalters. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1981.
LoLordo, Antonia. Pierre Gassendi and the Birth of Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Mack, Peter. A History of Renaissance Rhetoric 1380−1620. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Mankin, David, ed. Horace: Epodes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Margoliouth, H. M., ed. The Poems and Letters of Andrew Marvell, Vol. 1: Poems, 3rd edition rev. by Pierre Legouis with the collaboration of E. E. Duncan-Jones. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971.
Masen, Jacob. Palaestra eloquentiae ligatae. Ko¨ln: Demen, 1682.
Mayer, Roland. “Personata Stoa: Neostoicism and Senecan Tragedy”. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 57 (1994), 151-174.
Morford, Mark. “The Dual Citizenship of the Roman Stoics”. In Veritatis Amicitiaeque Causa: Essays in Honor of Anna Lydia Motto and John R. Clark, ed. Shannon N. Byrne et Edmund P. Cueva. Wauconda, Ill.: Bolchazy-Carducci, 1999, 147-164.
Morford, Mark. “The Stoic Garden”. The Journal of Garden History 7 (1987): 151-175.
Moss, Ann. “Literary imitation in the sixteenth century: writers and readers, Latin and French”. In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism Volume 3: The Renaissance, ed. Glyn Norton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, 107-118.
Moss, Ann. “Theories of poetry: Latin writers”. In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism Volume 3: The Renaissance, ed. Glyn Norton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, 98-106.
Moss, Ann. Printed Commonplace-Books and the Structuring of Renaissance Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Moss, Ann. Renaissance Truth and the Latin Language Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Obremski, Krzysztof. “‘Tyrsis, jakby stoik nowy’ i ‘pospolity pożytek’”. In Wątki neostoickie w literaturze polskiego renesansu i baroku: materiały z sesji Neostoicyzm w literaturze i kulturze staropolskiej, Szczecin, 20−22 października 1997 roku, ed. Piotr Urbański. Szczecin: Uniwersytet Szczeciński, 1999.
Oestreich,Gerhard. “Justus Lipsius und der politische Neustoizismus in Europa”. In Stoizismus in der europa¨ischen Philosophie, Literatur, Kunst und Politik, ed. Barbara Neymeyr, Jochen Schmidt and Bernhard Zimmermann. Berlin − New York: de Gruyter, 2008, 575-630.
Oestreich, Gerhard. Neostoicism and the Early Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
Pachtler, Georg Michael. Ratio Studiorum et Institutiones Scholasticae Societatis Jesu, per Germaniam olim vigentes. Berlin: A. Hofmann & Comp., 1887.
Pohlenz, Max, ed. Plutarchus: Moralia, vol. 6 fasc. 2. Leipzig: Teubner.
Pontanus, Jacobus. Poeticarum institutionum libri tres. Tyrocinium poeticum. Ingolstadt: David Sartorius, 1594.
Rosenmeyer, Thomas G. Senecan Drama and Stoic Cosmology. Berkeley: The University of California Press, 1989.
Roskam, Geert. A Commentary on Plutarch’s De Latenter Vivendo. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2007.
Roskam, Geert. Live Unnoticed: On the Vicissitudes of an Epicurean Doctrine. Leiden − Boston: Brill, 2007.
Rot, Ewa, ed. Jan Gawiński, Sielanki z gajem zielonym. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Literackich PAN, 2007.
Scaglione, Aldo. The Liberal Arts and the Jesuit College System. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1986.
Schiesaro, Alessandro. The Passions in Play. Thyestes and the Dynamics of Senecan Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Stępień, Paweł. Poeta barokowy wobec przemijania i śmierci: Hieronim Morsztyn, Szymon Zimorowic, Jan Andrzej Morsztyn. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo DiG, 1996.
Tuck, Richard. Philosophy and Government 1572−1651. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Urbański, Piotr. “Stoicyzm i neostoicyzm w kulturze polskiej”. In Humanitas. Projekty antropologii humanistycznej, ed. Alina Nowicka-Jeżowa. Warszawa: Neriton, 2010, vol. 2, 161-202.
Urbański, Piotr. Theologia fabulosa. Commentationes Sarbievianae. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, 2000.
Vischer, Rüdiger. Das einfache Leben. Wort- und motivgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zu einem Wertbegriff der antiken Literatur. Go¨ttingen Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1965.
Waszink, Jan, ed. Justus Lipsius, Politica: Six Books of Politics Or Political Instruction, edited with translation and introduction by Jan Waszink. Assen, Netherlands: Van Gorcum, 2004.
Watson, Lindsay C. A Commentary on Horace’s Epodes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, Ulrich von. Sappho und Simonides, Untersuchungen über griechische Lyriker. Berlin: Weidmann, 1913.
Williams, Gareth D. Banished Voices: Readings in Ovid’s Exile Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Zwierlein, Otto. L. Annaei Senecae Tragoediae. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
Uniwersytet Warszawski Polska
Wszystkie artykuły prezentowane na łamach „Prace Filologiczne. Literaturoznawstwo” są publikowane w otwartym dostępie na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa wersja 3.0 (CC-BY) 
