Kto ma prawo decydować? Pula i problem demilitaryzacji przestrzeni miejskiej
Abstrakt
In 2007, the Croatian army decided to close its military base on the Muzil peninsula, which is a part of the city of Pula. Muzil hosts about 20 percent of the city; moreover, it is located in a very attractive area with the view on the seaside and the city’s historical center. After the city received the area, negotiations began to decide about the future of the demilitarized land. This paper discusses the attitudes of two main actors of the public debate: the city council supported by the central authorities of Croatia and a nongovernmental organization established by a number of residents of Pula. The former wanted to transform the demilitarized area intoan elite tourist resort, while the latter proposed opening the peninsula to residents to rei ntegrate the postmilitary area with the city. The two attitudes are related to different ideas of usefulness and the city as a community of residents. The right to space reflects the fundamental question of participation in the public debate. Moreover, Pula can be seen as an example of the city, where extensive and uncontrolled development of tourism violates the interests of the local community.
Słowa kluczowe
turystyka; Muzil; Pula; przestrzeń miejska; planowanie przestrzenne
Bibliografia
Butula, Sona. “Planning for sustainable development: the significance of different social interests in landscape.” Društvena istraživanja: časopis za opća društvena pitanja, no. 65–66 (2003): 427–441. Available on-line: https://hrcak.srce.hr/19494 (acc. 23.04.2018).
Castells, Manuel. Wiek informacji: ekonomia, społeczeństwo, kultura, vol. 2: Siła tożsamości, trans. Sebastian Szymański. Warszawa: PWN, 2008.
Colomb, Claire, et Johannes Novy, eds. Protest and Resistance in the Tourist City. London–New York: Routledge, 2016.
Deboulet, Agnes, et Mona Fawaz. “Contesting the legitimacy of urban restructuring and highways in Beirut’s irregular settlements.” In Cities and sovereignty, eds. Diane E. Davis and Nora Libertun de Duren (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2011), 117–151.
Dukovski, Darko. Povijest Pule: deterministički kaos i jahači Apokalipse. Pula: Istarski ogranak Društva hrvatskih književnika, 2011.
Glavne značajke prostora i cjeline obuhvata, http://www.brijunirivijera.hr/program/glavne–znacajke–prostora–i–cjeline–obuhvata (acc. 10.08.2017).
Graham,Wade. Dream cities: Seven urban ideas that shape the world. New York:Harper Collins, 2016.
Jałowiecki, Bohdan, ed. Czyje jest miasto? Warszawa: Scholar, 2009.
Jugović, Alen, et Jasmina Gržinić, Slavko Lončar. “Makroekonomic legitimacy of investment in the development of golf tourism in Istria.” Economic research – Ekonomska istraživanja, no. 2 (2009): 66–85. Available on-line: https://hrcak.srce.hr/38212 (acc. 10.05.2018).
Kardov, Kruno. “Muzil: moja vizija, moji snovi.” In Kome pripadaju bivše vojne nekretnine? Iskustva prenamjene u Hrvatskoj, eds. LidijaKnežević, Nives Rogoznica. Zagreb: Centar za mirovne studije i Zavod za sociologiju Filozofskog fakulteta u Zagrebu, 2014, 99–136.
Korzeniak, Grażyna, ed. Zintegrowane planowanie rozwoju miast. Kraków: Instytut Rozwoju Miast, 2011.
Montgomery, Charles. Happy City: Transforming Our Lives Through Urban Design. London: Penguin Books, 2013.
“Odluka o utvrd—ivanju popisa trgovačkih društava i drugih pravnih osoba od strateškog i posebnog interesa za Republiku Hrvatsku.” Narodne Novine, no. 120 (2013), 2579.
Pańków, Lidia. Bloki w słońcu. Krótka historia Ursynowa Północnego.Wołowiec: Czarne, 2016.
Petar, Saša. “The development of tourism through the construction of golf courses.” Acta turistica nova, no. 1 (2010): 55–80. Available on-line: https://hrcak.srce.hr/61476 (acc. 10.05.2018).
“Pitanje prostora I eksperimentiranje s demokracijom nerazdvojni su,” interview with Michael Hardt. Otvoreni Muzil, no. 6 (2016): 4–6.
“Plan upravljanja državnom imovinom Republike Hrvatske za 2015. godinu.” Narodne Novine, no. 142 (2014), 2673.
Uniwersytet Warszawski Polska
Wszystkie artykuły prezentowane na łamach „Prace Filologiczne. Literaturoznawstwo” są publikowane w otwartym dostępie na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa wersja 3.0 (CC-BY) 
