The Lithuanian passive perfect and its history
Abstract
The aim of the article is to establish the existence and structure of the passive perfect in Lithuanian. This language has a periphrastic active perfect, but its passive counterpart, consisting of ‘be’ and a past passive participle, is not completely severed from its grammaticalisation source, the object resultative. Experiential uses are attested, which suggests that the resultative has to some extent become a perfect, but it is not clear to what extent the two can be teased apart. On the other hand, the experiential passive perfect has dedicated marking of its own as well, though it is not frequent. The Lithuanian passive perfect is thus a rather diffuse and weakly entrenched gram. The failure of the language to develop a clearly defined passive perfect can probably be explained formally and functionally by the overall low degree of grammaticalisation of the perfect (including the active perfect) in Lithuanian.
Keywords
Lithuanian, passive, perfect, object resultative, resultative perfect, experiential perfect, evidential
References
Ambrazas, Vytautas. 1979. Lietuvių kalbos dalyvių istorinė sintaksė [A Historical Syntax of Lithuanian Participles]. Vilnius: Mintis.
Ambrazas, Vytautas. 1990. Sravnitel’nyj sintaksis pričastij baltijskix jazykov [A Comparative Syntax of Baltic Participles]. Vilnius: Mokslas.
Ambrazas, Vytautas, ed. 2006. Lithuanian Grammar. Vilnius: Baltos lankos.
Arkadiev, Peter. 2011. Aspect and actionality in Lithuanian on a typological background. In: Daniel Petit, ed., Langues baltiques, langues slaves. Paris: Editions cnrs, 61–92.
Bybee, Joan L. & Östen Dahl. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13.1, 51–103.
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Blackwell.
Dahl, Östen & Viveka Velupillai. 2013 The Perfect. In: Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath, eds., The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/68.
Daugavet, Anna & Peter Arkadiev. 2021. The perfects in Latvian and Lithuanian: A comparative study based on questionnaire and corpus data. Baltic Linguistics 12 = Studies in the TAME Domain in Baltic and Its Neighbours (thematic issue), 73–165.
Geniušienė, Emma Š. 2006. Passives in Lithuanian (in comparison with Russian). In: Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö, eds., Passivization and Typology: Form and Function. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 29‒61.
Geniušienė, Emma. 2016. Passive Constructions in Lithuanian. Selected Works of Emma Geniušienė. Edited by Anna Kibort & Nijolė Maskaliūnienė. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Geniušienė, Emma Š. & Vladimir P. Nedjalkov. 1988. Resultative, passive, and perfect in Lithuanian. In: Vladimir P. Nedjalkov, ed., Typology of Resultative Constructions. English translation edited by Bernard Comrie. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 369–386.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1990. The grammaticalization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14.1, 25–72.
Holvoet, Ael. 2001. Impersonals and passives in Baltic and Finnic. In: Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm, eds., Circum-Baltic Languages. Vol. 2: Grammar and Typology. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 363–389.
Holvoet, Axel. 2007. Mood and Modality in Baltic. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Holvoet, Axel, Anna Daugavet & Vaiva Žeimantienė. 2021. The perfective present in Lithuanian. Baltic Linguistics 12 = Studies in the TAME Domain in Baltic and Its Neighbours (thematic issue), 249–293.
Kapkan, Danguolė K. 2021. Perfect in Lithuanian: A case study based on the data from Facebook comments. Baltic Linguistics 12 = Studies in the TAME Domain in Baltic and Its Neighbours (thematic issue), 21–71.
Keenan, Edward L. & Matthew S. Dryer. 2007. Passive in the world’s languages. In: Timothy Shopen, ed., Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. 1: Clause Structure, 325–361.
Lindstedt, Jouko. 2000. The perfect―aspectual, temporal and evidential. In: Östen Dahl, ed., Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin etc.: De Gruyter Mouton, 365–384.
Nau, Nicole & Axel Holvoet. 2015. Voice in Baltic: An overview. In: Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau, eds., Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1–36.
Nau, Nicole, Birutė Spraunienė & Vaiva Žeimantienė. 2020. The passive family in Baltic. Baltic Linguistics 11m= Studies in the Voice Domain in Baltic and Its Neighbours (thematic issue), 27–128.
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Sergej E. Jaxontov 1988. The typology of resultative constructions. In: Vladimir P. Nedjalkov, eds., Typology of Resultative Constructions. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 3–62.
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P., ed. 1988. Typology of Resultative Constructions. English translation edited by Bernard Comrie. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ritz, Marie-Eve. 2012. Perfect tense and aspect. In: Robert I. Binnick, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 881–907.
Ulvydas, Kazys, ed. 1971. Lietuvių kalbos gramatika. ii. Morfologija [Lithuanian Grammar, Vol. ii: Morphology]. Vilnius: Mintis.
Wiemer, Björn. 2006a. Relations between Actor-demoting devices in Lithuanian. In: Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö, eds., Passivization and Typology: Form and Function. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 274‒309.
Wiemer, Björn. 2006b. Grammatical evidentiality in Lithuanian (a typological assessment). Baltistica 41.1, 33–49.
