The agentive construction in Baltic and Fennic
Abstract
The article deals with the agentive construction, a construction identifying the agent used mainly in adnominal position and in the position of nominal predicate but distinct from the agented passive. The notion is known from Finnish grammar (where it has dedicated morphological marking, the agentive participle), but the article describes a similar construction in Latvian. The marking of the agent in the Fennic and Baltic agentive construction is possessive, which points to an areal convergence. The article offers a corpus-based analysis of the lexical input and the semantics of the Latvian agentive construction and discusses the relationship between the agentive construction and the resultative passive. Attention is also given to intra-Baltic historical processes, notably to mechanisms of the rise of an agented passive in Lithuanian from an original agentive construction as retained in Latvian.
Keywords
agent; agentive construction; passive; resultative passive
References
Ambrazas, Vytautas. 2001. Lietuvių kalbos pasyvo raidos bruožai [Outline of the development of the Lithuanian passive]. Acta Linguistica Lithuanica 45, 11-38.
Ambrazas, Vytautas. 2006. Lietuvių kalbos istorinė sintaksė [Lithuanian Historical Syntax]. Vilnius: Lietuvių kalbos institutas.
Ariste, Paul. 1968. A Grammar of the Votic Language (Indiana University Publications, Uralic and Altaic Series, 68). The Hague: Mouton.
Biber, Douglas et al. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Blevins, James P. 2003. Passives and impersonals. Journal of Linguistics 39, 473-520.
Budiņa – Lazdiņa, Terēza. 1966. Teach Yourself Latvian. London: The English Universities Press.
Chun, Soon Ae & David A. Zubin. 1990. Experiential vs. agentive constructions in Korean narrative. Berkeley Linguistics Society 16, 81-93.
Culy, Christopher. 1985. The complexity of the vocabulary of Bambara. Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 345-351.
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Blackwell.
de Smit, Merlijn. 2015. Agented participles in Baltic and Finnic. In: Santeri Junttila, ed., Contacts Between the Baltic and Finnic Languages (= Uralica Helsingiensia 7), 246-271.
Endzelin, Jan. 1923. Lettische Grammatik. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Eroms, Hans-Werner. 2000. Syntax der deutschen Sprache. Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1970. The grammar of hitting and breaking. In: Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum, eds., Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn & Co, 120-133.
Fraenkel, Ernst. 1928. Syntax der litauischen Kasus. Kaunas: L. U. Humanitarinių Mokslų Fakultetas.
Fredriksson, Anna-Lena. 2016. A Corpus-Based Contrastive Study of the Passive and Related Constructions in English and Swedish. Doctoral dissertation, University of Gothenburg. https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/41822/1/gupea_2077_41822_1.pdf.
Geniušienė, Emma. 2016. Passive Constructions in Lithuanian. Selected Works of Emma Geniušienė. Edited by Anna Kibort & Nijolė Maskaliūnienė. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hakulinen, Lauri. 1957, 1960. Handbuch der finnischen Sprache. 1-2. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Holvoet, Axel. 2001. Impersonals and Passives in Baltic and Finnic. In: Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm, eds., The Circum-Baltic Languages: Typology and Contact. Vol. , Grammar and Typology, Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 363-389.
Holvoet, Axel. 2007. Mood and Modality in Baltic. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Holvoet, Axel. 2018. On so-called converse reflexives in Slavic and Baltic, Zeitschrift für Slawistik 63.3, 373-394.
Huddleston, Rodney & Goeffrey K. Pullum, eds., 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: University Press.
Jakulienė, Audronė. 1968. Lietuvių kalbos pasyvo formavimasis ir sangrąžiniai veiksmažodžiai [Reflexive verbs and the formation of the Lithuanian passive]. Baltistica 4.2, 211-220.
Karlson, Fred. 2002. Finnish: An Essential Grammar. London-New York: Routledge.
Keenan, Edward L. & Matthew S. Dryer. 2007. Passive in the world’s languages. In: Timothy Shopen, ed. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. 1. Clause Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 325-361.
Laanemets, Anu. 2012. Passiv i moderne dansk, norsk og svensk. Et korpusbaseret studie af tale- og skriftsprog. Doctoral dissertation, University of Tartu. https://dspace.ut.ee/bitstream/handle/10062/27711/laanemets_anu.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Lavine, James E. 2006. Is there a passive evidential strategy in Lithuanian? Chicago Linguistic Society 42, 41-55.
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago-London: University of Chicago Press.
Lindström, Liina. 2015. Subjecthood of the agent argument in Estonian passive constructions. In: Marja-Liisa Hellasvuo & Tuomas Huumo, eds., Subjects in ConstructionsCanonical and Non-Canonical. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 141-173.
Maienborn, Claudia. 2007. Das Zustandspassiv. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 35, 83-114.
Malchukov, Andrej & Anna Siewierska. 2011. Introduction. In: Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska, eds., Impersonal Constructions. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1-15.
Nau, Nicole. 2016. Argument realization in Latvian action nominal constructions. A corpus-based investigation. In: Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau, eds., Argument Realization in Baltic, Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 461-518.
Nau, Nicole & Axel Holvoet. 2015. Voice in Baltic. An overview. In: Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau, eds., Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic, Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 323-365.
Shagal, Ksenia. 2017. Towards a Typology of Participles. PhD thesis, University of Helsinki.
Shore, Susanna. 1988. On the so-called Finnish passive. Word 39.3, 151-176.
Spraunienė, Birutė, Auksė Razanovaitė & Erika Jasionytė. 2015. Solving the puzzle of the Lithuanian passive. In: Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau, eds., Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic, Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 323-365.
Sulkala, Helena & Merja Karjalainen. 1992. Finnish. London-New York: Routledge.
Vaagland, Erling M. 1983. Zur Agensangabe im sein-Passiv. In: John O. Askedal, Christen Christensen, Adne Findreng & Oddleif Leirbukt, eds., Festschrift für Laurits Saltveit zum 70. Geburtstag am 31. Dezember 1983. Oslo-Bergen-Tromsø: Universitetsforlaget, 194-200.
Zwicky, Arnold. 1993. Heads, bases, and functors. In: Greville G. Corbett, Norman M. Fraser & Scott McGlashan, eds., Heads in Grammatical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 292-315.
Žolkovskij, Aleksandr K. & Igor’ A. Mel’čuk. 1967. O semantičeskom sinteze [On semantic synthesis]. Problemy kibernetiki 19, 177-238.
Vilnius University, Institute for the Languages and Cultures of the Baltic, Universiteto g. 5, LT-01131 Vilnius Lithuania
St Petersburg University, Department of General Linguistics, Universitetskaya nab. 11, RU-199034, St Petersburg & Vilnius University, Institute for the Languages and Cultures of the Baltic, Universiteto g. 5, LT-01131 Vilnius Russian Federation
Vilnius University, Institute for the Languages and Cultures of the Baltic, Universiteto g. 5, LT-01131 Vilnius Lithuania
Vilnius University, Institute for the Languages and Cultures of the Baltic, Universiteto g. 5, LT-01131 Vilnius Lithuania
