The Lithuanian “buvo + be-present active participle” construction revisited
A corpus-based study
Abstract
The paper presents the results of a large-scale corpus-based investigation of the Lithuanian construction involving a past-tense auxiliary būti ‘be’ and a present active participle, which in previous literature has been identified as avertive, i.e. expressing a past event that was imminent but did not occur. It is shown that although the avertive uses account for about three quarters of the occurrences of the construction, it has a robust share of progressive and proximative uses, and that, moreover, the counterfactuality meaning of the avertive is often provided by the context rather than directly encoded by the construction. The lexical and grammatical profiles of the different functions of the construction are investigated in detail, showing how lexical meaning and actionality interact with the semantics of the construction and with the context.
Keywords
Lithuanian; aspect; actionality; avertive; proximative; progressive
References
Alexandrova, Anna. 2016. Avertive constructions in Europe and North Asia. An areal typolo-gy. Presentation from Chronos 12, Caen, June 2016.
Alexandrova, Anna. 2019. Avertives & Co: Towards a typology of ‘almost’ in the verbal do-main. Presentation from the 13th Biennial meeting of the Association for Linguistic Typology, Pavia, September 2019/
Ambrazas, Vytautas. 1990. Sravnitel’nyj sintaksis pričastij baltijskiх jazykov [Comparative Syntax of Participles in Baltic Languages]. Vilnius: Mokslas.
Arkadiev, Peter. 2011a. On the aspectual uses of the prefix be- in Lithuanian. Baltic Linguis-tics 2, 37-78.
Arkadiev, Peter. 2011b. Aspect and actionality in Lithuanian on a typological background. In: Daniel Petit, Claire Le Feuvre, Henri Menantaud, eds., Langues baltiques, langues slaves. Paris: Éditions CNRS, 57-86.
Arkadiev, Peter. 2012. Aspektual’naja sistema litovskogo jazyka (s privlečeniem areal’nyx dannyx) [The aspectual system of Lithuanian (with some areal data)]. In Vladimir A. Plungjan (ed.), Issledovanija po teorii grammatiki, vyp. 6: Tipologija aspektual’nyx sistem i kategorij [Studies in the theory of grammar. Vol. 6. Typology of aspectual systems and categories]. (= Acta Linguistica Petropolitana, 8:2), 45-121.
Bertinetto, Pier Marco, Karen Ebert & Casper de Groot. 2000. The progressive in Europe. In: Östen Dahl, ed., Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 516-558.
Bybee, Joan L, Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Dowty, David R. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Everett, Daniel L. Pirahã. In: Desmond C. Derbyshire & Geoffrey K. Pullum, eds., Handbook of Amazonian Languages. Vol. 1. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 200-325.
Filip, Hana. 1999. Aspect, Eventuality Types, and Noun Phrase Semantics. New York: Gar-land.
Foley, William A. 1991. The Yimas Language of New Guinea. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Grimm, Nadine. 2015. A Grammar of Gyeli. PhD Dissertation, Humboldt-Universität Berlin.
Haiman, John. 1998. Hua (Papuan). In: Andrew Spencer & Arnold Zwicky, eds., The Hand-book of Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell, 539-562.
Heine, Bernd. 1994. On the genesis of aspect in African languages: The proximative. Pro-ceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society: Special Ses-sion on Historical Issues in African Linguistics, 35-46.
Holvoet, Axel. 2014. Phasal and proximative complementation: Lithuanian baigti. Baltic Linguistics 5, 81-122.
Johanson, Lars. 2000. Viewpoint operators in European languages. In Östen Dahl, ed., Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 27-188.
Kuteva, Tania. 1998. On identifying an evasive gram: Action narrowly averted. Studies in Language 22.1, 113-160.
Kuteva, Tania. 2001. Auxiliation. An Enquiry into the Nature of Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kuteva, Tania. 2009. Grammatical categories and linguistic theory: Elaborateness in gram-mar. In: Peter K. Austin, Oliver Bond, Monik Charette, David Nathan & Peter Sells, eds., Proceeding of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory 2. London: SOAS, 13-28.
Kuteva, Tania, Bas Aarts, Gergana Popova & Anvita Abbi. 2015. The grammar of “counter-to-fact”. Presentation at the conference Diversity Linguistics: Retrospect and Pro-spect, Leipzig, May 2015.
Maslov, Jurij S. 1981. Grammatika bolgarskogo jazyka [A grammar of Bulgarian]. Moscow: Vysšaja škola.
Platicyna, Olga. 2014. Grammatičeskie profili litovskix glagolov: predvaritel’noe statis-tičeskoe issledovanie na materiale častotnogo slovarja. [Grammatical profiles of Lithuanian verbs: A preliminary quantitative investigation on the basis of a frequen-cy dictionary.] Term paper, Chair of General linguistics, Saint-Petersburg State Uni-versity.
Plungian, Vladimir A. 2001. Antirezul’tativ: do i posle rezul’tata. In: Vladimir A. Plungian (ed.), Issledovanija po teorii grammatiki. Vyp. 1. Glagol’nye kategorii [Studies in the Theory of Grammar. Vol. 1. Verbal categories]. Moscow: Russkie slovari, 50-88.
Sližienė, Nijolė. 1961. Apie sudurtines pradėtines veiksmažodžių formas [About the peri-phrastic inceptive verbal forms]. Lietuvių kalbotyros klausimai 4, 42-64.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Ekkehard König. 1991. The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticali-zation revisited. In: Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine, eds., Approaches to Grammaticalization. Vol. I. Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Am-sterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 189-218.
Utka, Andrius. 2009. Dažninis rašytinės lietuvių kalbos žodynas 1 milijono žodžių morfolo-giškai anotuoto tekstyno pagrindu. [A frequency dictionary of written Lithuanian based on an annotated -million-word corpus.] Kaunas: VDU.
Vafaeian, Ghazaleh. 2018. Progressives in Use and Contact. A Descriptive, Areal and Typo-logical Study with Special Focus on Selected Iranian Languages. PhD Dissertation, Stockholm University.
Ziegeler, Debra. 2000. What almost can reveal about counterfactual inferences. Journal of Pragmatics 32, 1743-1776.
Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Slavic Studies, Leninskij prospekt 32-A, RU-119334 Moscow & Vilnius University, Institute for the Lenguages and Cultures of the Baltic, Universiteto g. 5, LT-01131 Vilnius Russian Federation
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4503-2634
